On the afternoon of July 10, 2026, the "Commercial Case Trial and Agency Practice Salon from the Perspective of Arbitration" hosted by the Commercial Arbitration Committee of Jingsh Law Firm (National) was successfully held at Beijing Jingsh Law Firm (Tianjin). This event is an important stop in the series of professional activities of Jingshi Law Firm (National) Commercial Arbitration Committee. It aims to focus on the pain points of the entire process of commercial arbitration cases, dismantle practical agency skills, case procedural compliance points and evidence sorting organizational ideas, unify case handling standards, comprehensively improve lawyers' ability to win arbitration cases and professional standards, and build a regular business exchange and learning platform for legal colleagues inside and outside the firm. Many lawyer colleagues from Jingsh Law Firm’s headquarters and Tianjin branch gathered together to conduct in-depth exchanges on cutting-edge practical issues in commercial arbitration.
Director of Jingsh Law Firm’s Professional Discipline Committee Cai Chunlei, Director of Jingsh Law Firm (National)Commercial Arbitration Special CommitteePeng Yanbin, Deputy Director of Jingsh Law Firm (National) Commercial Arbitration Special CommitteeBai Xiaoqiang, Secretary General of Jingsh Law Firm (National)Commercial Arbitration Special CommitteeGuo Songyang, former senior judge of Tianjin First Intermediate People’s Court and c urrent arbitrator of Tianjin Arbitration CommissionQi Wanjiu, Director of the Ar bitration Committee of Tianjin Lawyers AssociationNie Huijie, and Director of Jingsh Tianjin Law Firm, Director of Data Compliance and Governance Legal Affairs Department Cai Ming , Director of Jingsh Tianjin Law Firm Management Committee, Director of Construction Engineering Legal Affairs Department, Director of Youth Working Committee Zhang Wenjuan, Executive Director of Jingsh Tianjin Law Firm Liu Jie , Jingsh Lawyer Zhang Junshuo and others participated. This salon is hosted by Director Zhang Wenjuan.
▲Moderator: Zhang Wenjuan, Director of the Management Committee of Jingsh Tianjin Law Firm, Director of the Construction Engineering Legal Affairs Department, and Director of the Youth Working Committee
▲Nie Huijie, Director of the Arbitration Committee of Tianjin Lawyers Association
Attorney Nie Huijie, director of the Arbitration Committee of the Tianjin Lawyers Association, first gave a keynote speech. With the title of "From Case Filing to Judicial Supervision: Practical Methods and Core Skills of Lawyer Representation in the Whole Process of Commercial Arbitration", she systematically explained the agreement drafting standards, identification of high-frequency pitfall clauses and the implementation background of the new Arbitration Law, starting from the institutional cornerstone of the arbitration agreement as the "lifeline". Apply the principle of independence, and then go into the practical aspects of case filing, detailing refined strategies such as case characterization, sorting out major events, document writing, and evidence organization. It also combines the differences in domestic and foreign evidence rules and trial winning techniques, focuses on the execution of awards and judicial supervision, comprehensively analyzes the statutory reasons for annulment and non-execution and practical responses, and elaborates on the systematic agency methodology for the entire link from arbitration case filing to execution.
Then it entered the guest topic sharing session, and three industry experts successively brought wonderful sharing:
▲Cai Chunlei, director of the Practice D iscipline Committee of Jingsh Law Firm
Cai Chunlei**, director of the Practical Discipline Committee of Jingshi Law Firm, took the title of**"A review of blind spots in the full process of arbitration procedures - common procedural issues from service, court formation to court hearings" and systematically sorted out 66 key nodes in the entire process of arbitration from program initiation, court formation, program management, interim measures, written preparation to arbitration and judicial supervision. Combining the comparison of the BAC and Tianjin Arbitration Rules, it explains in detail the compliance points and operational differences in the tribunal formation stage such as the selection of arbitrators inside and outside the roster, the composition of a sole-person arbitral tribunal and a three-member arbitral tribunal, information disclosure, challenge application and replacement procedures, while emphasizing the effectiveness of service and the time limit for producing evidence in pre-trial procedures. , jurisdictional objections and other common risk blind spots, and provides a systematic practical guide for lawyers to prevent the risk of procedural loss of power.
▲Qi Wanjiu, former senior judge of Tianjin First Intermediate People’s Court and current arbitrator of Tianjin Arbitration Commission
Qi Wanjiu, former senior judge of the Tianjin First Intermediate People's Court and current arbitrator of the Tianjin Arbitration Commission, took the topic "Relevant Issues that Should Be Attentioned to Evidence and Cross-Examination in Arbitration Procedures" from the perspective of full-process management of evidence, and systematically proposed ten practical points for the production and cross-examination of arbitration: emphasizing comprehensive collection of evidence to lay a solid foundation for facts, careful combing of evidence to clarify the logical chain, standardized production of evidence catalogs to improve the presentation effect, and strict compliance The time limit for evidence submission is to avoid the risk of loss of rights, and attention is paid to avoiding illegal evidence to ensure the admissibility of evidence. At the same time, it is advocated to oppose dogmatism, cross-examination opinions should be complete and clear, be good at discovering loopholes in the other party's evidence, avoid lengthy arguments to improve the efficiency of the trial, and finally return to the comparative perspective of arbitration and litigation, reminding lawyers that they should fully understand the unique advantages and limitations of the arbitration system in terms of evidence rules, and providing participants with a practical evidence operation guide that combines practicality and strategic thinking.
▲Peng Yanbin, Director of the Commercial Arbitration Committee of Jingsh Law Firm (National)
Dr. Peng Yanbin, Director of the Commercial Arbitration Committee of Jingsh Law Firm (National), took the topic "Looking at the Compliance Boundary of Arbitration Procedures from the Case of Withdrawal: A Practical Analysis of Statutory Grounds for Revocation" to systematically sort out the normative document system involved in the judicial review of commercial arbitration, covering policy levels, laws and regulations, judicial interpretations, international treaties and Supreme Court replies, meeting minutes, guiding cases and other multi-dimensional basis, and then conducted an in-depth analysis around the seven statutory grounds for revocation stipulated in the Arbitration Law. , from the aspects of whether there is an arbitration agreement and its validity, over-awarding, procedural violations, falsification of core evidence, the other party's concealment of core evidence, the arbitrator's violation of laws and disciplines, and the violation of social and public interests that are separately listed as reasons for the revocation of the award, combined with typical cases of courts in many places, it analyzes the court's decision logic and identification standards in judicial review one by one, and introduces re-arbitration and relief paths after revocation. It provides systematic practical guidance for lawyers to prevent arbitration procedural risks and avo id the revocation of awards.
Book donation session, Cai Chunlei**, director of the Practice Discipline Committee of Jingshi Law Firm, presented**"Commercial Arbitration Practice"compiled by their organization to Mr.Qi Wanjiuand Director Nie Huijie. This book embodies the practical experience and theoretical research results of many senior experts in the arbitration field, including Director Cai Chunlei, for many years, and aims to provide systematic professional guidance for arbitration practitioners.
The successful holding of this salon marks the continued and in-depth advancement of the series of professional activities of the Commercial Arbitration Committee of Jingsh Law Firm (National) at the branch level. As one of the stops in the Commercial Arbitration Commission’s “Into the Branch” series of activities, this event not only promoted professional collaboration and resource sharing between the headquarters and the Tianjin Branch, but also established a high-quality commercial arbitration business exchange platform for legal colleagues inside and outside the firm. In the future, the Commercial Arbitration Committee of Jingsh Law Firm (National) will continue to carry out a series of professional activities, continue to deepen professional research and practical exploration in the field of commercial arbitration, and promote the professional capacity building of the entire system of Jingsh Law Firm in the field of commercial arbitration to a new level.